avira free security suite 2017 definition updates

The deeper the malware got in, the more important a false positive file, the bigger the impact on the test results. Their researchers’ tools analyzed how deep select malware could get into the tested device and also the extent and importance of a false positive alert. Instead of using a huge sample set of malware or suspect files, they took a penetration test approach. SE Labs takes more of the pincer approach. They then run a large number of files and apps on the device to see triggers a false positive alarm. Essentially, they direct a large quantity of known malware at the device and seeing what goes in the cracks of the antivirus app. And yes, both approaches are legitimate and valuable.ĪV-Comparatives and AV-Test have more of a bucket approach. Testing with a bucket or pincersĪntivirus tests from reputable agencies (where the result is not conditional upon payment) generally have two primary approaches as they create their testing methodologies: a bucket or some pincers. Our flagship free product had the highest score of any of the free antivirus included in the test. We are pleased to put this award from SE Labs alongside the other awards Avira security products have received from other independent testing groups such as AV-Comparatives and AV-Test. Avira Free Security Suite has won an “AA” rating from SE Labs due to its performance in the independent lab’s “Home Anti-Malware Protection” test.

Avira free security suite 2017 definition updates